Sunday, March 15, 2009

Prejudice gets into the way of communication!

For this week’s post, I shall write about a video that I watched for one of my modules which showed how communication is hindered when the parties involved are blinded by prejudices.

Here is a little background information before I go on.

There is cult named Aum Shrinrikyo in Japan that many might have heard of. It is infamous for the sarin nerve gas attack that was released by some of the cult members in the subway in 1995. As sarin is a deadly nerve gas poison, many people were killed and thousands were injured.

The video I watched was a true record of the conflict between the police and some of the cult members after the 1995 incident. The whole thing started when the group of police officers stopped a group of Aum members in the middle of the street, demanding to know the names of those members as well as the purpose of their gathering. The police were probably afraid of another attack similar to what had happened in 1995. They were not letting these members go unless they revealed the necessary information.

However, the members were not cooperative as they felt they were doing no wrong. Things got worse when one of the members dodged the police and attempted to escape. His plan failed when one of the policemen held on to him. In a split second, both were toppled and had fallen to the ground.

The cult member hurt his head as he hit the ground. The police also injured his leg and started accusing the member for dragging him down.

That was where the video stopped and the professor continued what the video had left on. It seemed that this very same video was used as evidence to show that the police pushed the member down during the process of trying to stop the escape. Without the presence of this video, that member might have been sentenced to jail for assaulting the police.

Things would not get so ugly if the police had practised active listening and listened to the explanation brought forth by the members. In addition, their tones could have been better because they sounded as though they were interrogating criminals. Besides that, they should have adjusted their non verbal cues as they cornered the members which proved that they were hostile. All in all, the impression that the police made was antagonistic and that might have been one of the reasons why the Aum Members were not cooperating. It is understandable that they practised caution because it is their job to keep society safe and protect the public. However, they should have handled this matter more professionally instead of letting personal prejudices affect the way they behave.

The Aum members were also partly responsible for this misunderstanding. They might be different from the culprit responsible for the 1995 incident but no one could tell unless they prove or convince others. Truly, proving that would be difficult initially as many people have the stereotype that all cult members were as evil as the culprit. Due to this reason, they should have been patient and answered the questions from the police to ease their insecurity. When that member attempted to run away, his action only convinced the police that their suspicious were right.

In conclusion, this is a typical example of how a misunderstanding is formed because of the prejudices that prevent effective communication. If both parties can show more understanding for each other then such an incident may not happen.

4 comments:

  1. The video sounds very interesting, Gillian. I wonder of it's available on Youtube. This post seems to focus on a prejudicial act of violence instigated by the police. is that correct? Did your professor give any indication that the police were absolutely certain that the group of people they had cornered were Aum members?

    Thanks for sharing this with us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Brad,
    I also think that this video is VERY INTERESTING. I was really shocked when I saw how the police accused the Aum member. It was so obvious he pushed down the person and pretended that he was badly hurt after the fall. So you are right about my post.

    Unfortunately, I don't think this video is available in Youtube. It is from a DVD.(they make a court evidence into a DVD! -_-")

    To answer your last question, my prof did mentioned that this was a video about the Aum members. At the first part of the video, these Aum members were interviewed about the reasons why they joined this cult and whether they regret after the sarin incident.

    In the second part, then it showed the conflict between the same group of Aum members interviewed and the police. Therefore, I was quite certain that the people that were cornered by the police were Aum members.

    I vaguely remember that some members were wearing a T-shirt imprinted with the face of their Master, Asahara.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the explanation, Gillian!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Reading this post, I'm wondering if something other than being prejudice needs to be brought into discussion, especially in this case. Taking the role of the police, what if he let the the Aum members go and he was wrong about it? What if the Aum member that ran off set off a bomb? The fear of being wrong would take center stage and supersede other emotions and thoughts.

    While I'm not condoning police violence, I understand how adrenaline rush from being involved in such an event causes the ability to communicate effectively to be significantly compromised. Perhaps what could be improved on the part of the police, is the ability to keep a level head during the confrontation. Only then, can they resume communication and prevent such occurrences from happening again.

    ReplyDelete